Ambika Responds to Radha’s Rs 46 Crore Cheque Allegations: What We Know So Far

A family dispute involving veteran actresses Ambika and Radha has taken a serious turn after a complaint concerning five cheques and an alleged financial transaction worth Rs 46 crore reached the Chennai Police Commissioner’s office. The matter reportedly involves disagreements over family property, business interests and gold, with both sisters now presenting sharply different accounts of what happened.

According to a report published by NTV Telugu on September 22, 2026, Radha had complained against her sister Ambika and brother Mallikarjun, alleging that signed blank cheques kept by her were taken without her permission and subsequently used in connection with a Rs 46 crore transaction. Ambika has rejected those allegations and offered a different explanation for how the cheques came into her possession.

The dispute is now being closely followed because it combines a large financial figure, a long-standing family disagreement and the involvement of two well-known names from South Indian cinema.

What Is the Rs 46 Crore Cheque Dispute About?

At the centre of the controversy are five cheques that Radha and Ambika describe very differently.

Radha's complaint, as reported by NTV Telugu, alleges that signed blank cheques had been kept by her and that five of them were taken without her knowledge. She alleged that the cheques were subsequently used for an attempted transaction involving Rs 46 crore and sought an investigation and criminal action.

Ambika has denied stealing any cheques. Her version is that Radha herself handed over five cheques to her as part of efforts to resolve disagreements involving family assets and other financial matters.

This difference in the two accounts is important. The central issue is not simply the value mentioned in the cheque dispute, but also the circumstances in which the cheques were handed over, what agreement existed between the family members and whether the documents were used in accordance with that understanding.

Those questions would ultimately depend on documentary evidence and the findings of the relevant authorities.

Ambika Gives Her Side of the Story

Ambika has publicly rejected Radha's allegations and said that she received the five cheques directly from her sister.

According to Ambika's account reported by NTV Telugu, the cheques were provided during discussions aimed at resolving disputes involving family property, business interests and gold. She specifically referred to disagreements concerning a 50-cent property in Maduravoyal, a share in ARS Gardens and gold-related matters.

Ambika also said that she had already approached the police regarding aspects of the family dispute in July.

Her response changes the context of the cheque controversy. Rather than describing the cheques as stolen documents, she says they were given to her as part of an arrangement intended to settle broader family disagreements.

However, these are Ambika's claims and should be distinguished from facts that have been independently established. The competing accounts mean that the precise circumstances surrounding the cheques remain an important part of the dispute.

Ambika's Warning Over the Cheques

Ambika has also indicated that she could approach the police herself if the cheques given to her are rejected by the bank.

Her statement suggests that she considers the cheques to be connected to the understanding reached during attempts to resolve the family's financial and property disagreements.

Whether such a complaint is ultimately made, and what authorities determine about the underlying transaction, will depend on subsequent developments.

Why Did the Dispute Reach the Police?

Financial disagreements within families can become complicated when property ownership, business interests and financial documents are involved. In this case, the disagreement appears to extend beyond a single cheque.

NTV Telugu's report says the sisters have had disputes concerning property, business matters and gold. Radha's complaint brought allegations concerning the cheques and the Rs 46 crore figure to the attention of the Chennai Police Commissioner.

A previous NTV Telugu report on September 21 said Radha alleged that old signed cheques had been used without her authorization and that the transaction came to light after she was contacted by bank officials.

These allegations have not been established as proven wrongdoing. They form part of Radha's complaint and are disputed by Ambika.

The Importance of Documentary Evidence

In disputes involving cheques and substantial financial amounts, documentation can become particularly significant.

Several questions may need to be clarified, including:

• Who physically possessed the cheques?
• When were the cheques handed over?
• Was there a written agreement between the family members?
• What purpose were the cheques intended to serve?
• What amount was written on each cheque?
• What instructions were given to the bank?
• Were the cheques presented for payment?
• What records exist concerning the underlying property or business arrangements?

The answers to such questions could help authorities understand the competing versions of events.

Bank records, agreements, correspondence and other financial documents may therefore become important if the dispute proceeds further.

Background: Ambika and Radha's Connection to South Indian Cinema

Ambika and Radha are sisters who became prominent actresses in South Indian cinema, particularly during the 1980s. Both built successful careers across industries including Tamil, Telugu and Malayalam cinema.

Their professional history makes the current family dispute particularly notable to film audiences. However, their cinematic careers and the current financial disagreement are separate matters.

The present controversy concerns allegations surrounding family assets, business interests and cheques. It should not be confused with their professional achievements or past work in the film industry.

For fans who remember the sisters from their active years in cinema, the development is significant mainly because a private family disagreement has now entered the public and legal sphere.

What Could Happen Next?

The immediate focus is likely to remain on the evidence surrounding the disputed cheques and the broader family disagreements.

If the matter continues through police or legal channels, the parties may be required to provide supporting documents and explanations. The authorities could examine the allegations made by Radha as well as Ambika's response.

The situation could also develop in several ways. The family members may reach a settlement, additional complaints could be filed, or the matter could proceed through formal legal processes.

At this stage, it would be premature to determine the outcome.

Why the Rs 46 Crore Figure Has Drawn Attention

The reported amount of Rs 46 crore has naturally attracted attention because it is a substantial sum. However, the figure itself does not establish that money was successfully taken or transferred.

The available report describes allegations surrounding an attempted or disputed transaction and Ambika's denial of wrongdoing. The exact financial status of the transaction would need to be established through banking records and any subsequent investigation.

This distinction is important when discussing a developing dispute involving allegations of financial misconduct.

What This Means for the Family Dispute

Beyond the cheque controversy, the dispute highlights how disagreements involving shared family assets can become complicated when several interests overlap.

Ambika has referred to property, business and gold-related disagreements, while Radha's complaint focuses on the alleged unauthorized use of signed cheques.

Resolving such disputes may require clarity about ownership, agreements, financial obligations and the intentions of each party.

The involvement of well-known film personalities also means that developments are likely to receive significant public attention. At the same time, allegations should remain clearly distinguished from findings that may emerge from an official investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are involved in the Rs 46 crore cheque dispute?

The dispute involves veteran actress Radha, her sister and actress Ambika, and their brother Mallikarjun. Radha has made allegations concerning the use of five cheques, while Ambika has rejected the allegations.

What is the amount involved in the dispute?

The reported figure connected with the disputed cheques is Rs 46 crore. The amount is part of the allegations and does not by itself establish that the money was successfully transferred or taken.

What has Ambika said about the five cheques?

Ambika has said that Radha gave her five cheques in connection with attempts to settle disagreements involving family property, business matters and gold. She denies taking the cheques without permission.

What did Radha allege?

According to the NTV Telugu report, Radha alleged that signed blank cheques kept by her were taken without her permission and used in connection with a Rs 46 crore transaction. She approached the Chennai Police Commissioner seeking an investigation.

Has the dispute been legally resolved?

There is no final resolution reported in the source article. The competing claims remain part of an ongoing dispute, and further developments would be needed before its outcome can be determined.

Why is this story receiving attention?

The story has attracted attention because it involves two well-known veteran actresses, a major financial figure and a family disagreement that has reached the police authorities.

Conclusion

The Rs 46 crore cheque controversy involving Ambika and Radha is currently a dispute marked by two conflicting versions of events. Radha has alleged that signed cheques were taken and used without her authorization, while Ambika strongly denies the allegation and says the cheques were voluntarily given to her as part of efforts to settle wider family disagreements.

The reported dispute also involves property, business and gold-related matters, making the cheque issue only one part of a larger family disagreement.

As the matter develops, documentary evidence, banking records and any findings from the authorities will be crucial in establishing what actually happened. Until those processes are completed, the allegations from either side should be treated as claims rather than established facts.

For now, the public focus remains on how the two sisters' conflicting accounts will be addressed and whether the dispute can eventually be resolved through legal proceedings or a settlement.